Open letter to my two friends:

Within 24 hours you both told me of the horrors of Buckhead, Georgia.  Sounds like an eruption of violence and criminality that shocks your conscience.  (One of you actually warned that dozens of immigrants may be arriving in my neighborhood and wanting to move into my house, as if some unnamed Guatemalan tour guide is trudging through central Mexico this minute with my address on scrap of paper in their pocket, but that problem is for another day.)

For those of my other friends peaking at this open letter who don’t already know, Buckhead is a rich, white (80%+) suburb of Atlanta that has had an uptick in crime, maybe even a serious uptick.  My two friends live in rich, white (80%+) suburbs of Cleveland and Hartford.

Violent crime, crimes against property, and vandalism have disrupted life in Black neighborhoods in Atlanta and Cleveland and Hartford for decades, and neither of you ever has said a word to me about that problem.  But crime goes up in Buckhead, and you and apparently millions of other Americans act like the world is about to end.  Just hearing about it, my God, it’s almost enough to make you want to go out and lynch somebody!

WAIT!  To all my conservative friends:  Don’t stop reading.  I’m not accusing you of being about to join a lynch mob.  I just needed to get your attention.

I’m trying to get you to stop and think about how you learned about Buckhead and how that source is playing on things that operate deep inside you and all of us, things we rarely think about and even more rarely recognize for what they are.

Why is it that you find the news from Buckhead so compelling, but you dismiss without a thought the horrors suffered for decades by poor Blacks in Atlanta?  Why is it that news of a shooting in an upscale mall in Atlanta is a call to arms that you must share with all your friends, while you are silent when a single mother is shot down outside her supermarket in a poor, Black neighborhood in your own city?  Buckhead is 1000 miles away, for Pete’s sake.  Why do you care about Buckhead?

You know why we care about what’s happening in Buckhead?  Because that stuff isn’t supposed to happen to “us”; it happens to “other” people; ”  It’s called white solidarity.  We whites have to stick together.   If it’s happening to white people in Buckhead, it’s tantamount to happening to us.

We don’t even think about why we think those things or where those thoughts come from.  All we know is that a threat to rich, white folks anywhere is a threat to all of “us.”

We all have it.  We grew up with it.  Our lives, white lives, are the way life is supposed to be, and the stereotypical lives of poor, Black urban Americans are the way their lives are supposed to be.  They shouldn’t live where we live, and they certainly shouldn’t visit the worst of their lives on us.  It’s just not supposed to be that way.

I’ve admitted it here before, and I’ll admit it again: it’s in me just like it’s in you.  I have those thoughts.  It’s part of American culture – we find it natural, we find it normal that the lives of whites are different and better than the lives of Blacks.  As Kendi says, we all have been stamped from the beginning.

However, in a country that aspires to be the very best, to treat all people with dignity and fairness, to allow all people to be free, those thoughts inside us are wrong.  Safe, secure, and peaceful for whites and violent, insecure, and threatening for Blacks is NOT the way it’s supposed to be in the United States.  Crime in Buckhead is NOT a bigger problem than crime anyplace else in Atlanta, even if people in Buckhead pay more in taxes.

So, recognize that your alarm at events in Buckhead is your white supremacy showing.  Once you recognize it working within you, you will begin to recognize why so many Americans continue to ask for change.

We won’t make it right until we see it in ourselves.

Wishing you and everyone all the joys of freedom.  Happy Juneteenth, everyone!


Discover more from Hartford Today and Tomorrow

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “Open Letter to Two Friends”

  1. Wow – well said, Mark! Something is indeed seriously wrong when we worry about crime in rich neighborhoods only. I hope your essay forces more people to think about that. (And thank you for the chuckle at the notion of the Guatemalan tour guide with your address.)

  2. Wow – well said, Mark! Something is indeed seriously wrong when we worry about crime in rich neighborhoods only. I hope your essay forces more people to think about that. (And thank you for the chuckle at the notion of the Guatemalan tour guide with your address.)

  3. Allan, you’re correct that rising crime and violence is a problem in America, and I didn’t intend to imply otherwise.

    I think you have missed my point. The point is not that we have problems that need to be addressed. The point is that in a society where white supremacy is a societal norm, we address problems differently depending on the racial mix of the people affected by the problem.

    How this country has reacted to crime for decades, and how my friends reacted to increased crime in Buckhead, affords us the opportunity to see white supremacist attitudes at work in our country. Drugs, addiction, and related crime were prevalent in some Black communities in the 50s, and white America largely ignored the problem. Then, in the late 60s and 70s, drug use spread to whites. Drug enforcement became a big issue. The observable fact is that the country reacted differently to the problem depending on who was affected. (And, by the way, the reaction was to pass laws that disproportionately imprisoned Blacks.)

    White Americans need to begin to recognize what Blacks have seen for decades: when viewed from a white supremacist perspective, problems are important to whites only if they affect whites. That is exactly why the slogan (not the organization) “Black lives matter” is so meaningful to so many people. It is a Black plea to white people to recognize that their problems matter.

    So, by all means, let’s address crime in Buckhead. But this time, let’s address it everywhere.

    Have a happy Juneteenth!

  4. Allan, you’re correct that rising crime and violence is a problem in America, and I didn’t intend to imply otherwise.

    I think you have missed my point. The point is not that we have problems that need to be addressed. The point is that in a society where white supremacy is a societal norm, we address problems differently depending on the racial mix of the people affected by the problem.

    How this country has reacted to crime for decades, and how my friends reacted to increased crime in Buckhead, affords us the opportunity to see white supremacist attitudes at work in our country. Drugs, addiction, and related crime were prevalent in some Black communities in the 50s, and white America largely ignored the problem. Then, in the late 60s and 70s, drug use spread to whites. Drug enforcement became a big issue. The observable fact is that the country reacted differently to the problem depending on who was affected. (And, by the way, the reaction was to pass laws that disproportionately imprisoned Blacks.)

    White Americans need to begin to recognize what Blacks have seen for decades: when viewed from a white supremacist perspective, problems are important to whites only if they affect whites. That is exactly why the slogan (not the organization) “Black lives matter” is so meaningful to so many people. It is a Black plea to white people to recognize that their problems matter.

    So, by all means, let’s address crime in Buckhead. But this time, let’s address it everywhere.

    Have a happy Juneteenth!

  5. Louis Todisco

    The extent of violence and crime in areas where poor people and persons of color live is a national disgrace. Chicago, with its epidemic of guns and murder, mostly affecting poor people and persons of color, is perhaps an extreme example, but it is not the only place where these conditions exist. These conditions, i.e. high levels of crime and violence, do not exist to the same extent in areas where the population is predominantly affluent and white as they do where the population is predominantly poor and of persons of color. We can probably all agree on this much.
    The next step is more difficult. If we who are affluent and white can agree that crime and violence affect poor people and people of color to a greater extent than they affect affluent white people, do we then have to ask why this situation is allowed to exist ? Do we have to ask further then is it because those of us who are affluent and white do not care enough about the level of crime and violence against poor people and persons of color to see to it that this does not continue ? It is much harder to agree (admit) that you do not care enough to do something, than it it is to admit the condition exists.

    Maybe we as individuals and as a society have to come to grips, first, with whether we really care enough, to be a part of the solution to the inequities in our country that harm the lives of persons who are poor and who are of color. Maybe the conversation should be at this level, that is do we care, rather than at the level of debating abstract propositions such as “white privilege” or “white supremacy” which raise emotions and divert attention from practical solutions.

    What those solutions may be is a question for another day.

  6. The extent of violence and crime in areas where poor people and persons of color live is a national disgrace. Chicago, with its epidemic of guns and murder, mostly affecting poor people and persons of color, is perhaps an extreme example, but it is not the only place where these conditions exist. These conditions, i.e. high levels of crime and violence, do not exist to the same extent in areas where the population is predominantly affluent and white as they do where the population is predominantly poor and of persons of color. We can probably all agree on this much.
    The next step is more difficult. If we who are affluent and white can agree that crime and violence affect poor people and people of color to a greater extent than they affect affluent white people, do we then have to ask why this situation is allowed to exist ? Do we have to ask further then is it because those of us who are affluent and white do not care enough about the level of crime and violence against poor people and persons of color to see to it that this does not continue ? It is much harder to agree (admit) that you do not care enough to do something, than it it is to admit the condition exists.

    Maybe we as individuals and as a society have to come to grips, first, with whether we really care enough, to be a part of the solution to the inequities in our country that harm the lives of persons who are poor and who are of color. Maybe the conversation should be at this level, that is do we care, rather than at the level of debating abstract propositions such as “white privilege” or “white supremacy” which raise emotions and divert attention from practical solutions.

    What those solutions may be is a question for another day.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse additional essays below

  • All
  • Buffalo Bills and More
  • Hartford and the Region
  • This and That

ON THE CONSTITUTION, 85%, AND IDAHO

A friend suggested that I watch the YouTube video of The Scalia Lecture at Harvard Law School presented by Associate Justice Breyer in April 2021.  The lecture is entitled “The Authority of the Court and the ...
Continue Reading

Goodbye, GOP

Why am I no longer a Republican? I know, many of you think that’s the wrong question.  The correct question, you say, is “why were you ever a Republican?” Here’s how it happened.  When I first ...
Continue Reading

REASONS FOR OPTIMISM

I was talking to a friend the other day about racism.  He is pessimistic and discouraged.  He understands now how deeply embedded racism is in our culture and how difficult it will be to root it ...
Continue Reading

Trump Brought Out the Anti-Racist in Many of Us

By way of background, I read Mark’s blog on white supremacy and then wrote him an email suggesting that while he was correct, he was missing an important piece of the larger picture.  After several back-and-forth ...
Continue Reading

THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN

For weeks, over and over, people said the election was stolen. Many of us have been baffled by such assertions.  How can so many people honestly believe the election was stolen when there is essentially no ...
Continue Reading

STEFANOWSKI

Give Bob Stefanowski credit for getting one thing right:  Connecticut’s cities have major problems.  Other than that, this guy who seems to still want to be Governor of Connecticut is clueless or lying. In case you ...
Continue Reading

THE NEXT NEW WORLD

Our country was founded on a simple but profound principle:  That free people will build a new world, a better world.  There was no way that the Founding Fathers could have known what we would build, ...
Continue Reading

RACISM ISN’T A POLITICAL PROBLEM

We should get one thing straight: Racism is a cultural problem, not a political problem.  Racism isn’t about Democrat and Rebublican, and it isn’t about passing laws to fix racism. Racism is a cultural problem.  Racism ...
Continue Reading

6 thoughts on “Open Letter to Two Friends”

  1. Wow – well said, Mark! Something is indeed seriously wrong when we worry about crime in rich neighborhoods only. I hope your essay forces more people to think about that. (And thank you for the chuckle at the notion of the Guatemalan tour guide with your address.)

  2. Wow – well said, Mark! Something is indeed seriously wrong when we worry about crime in rich neighborhoods only. I hope your essay forces more people to think about that. (And thank you for the chuckle at the notion of the Guatemalan tour guide with your address.)

  3. Allan, you’re correct that rising crime and violence is a problem in America, and I didn’t intend to imply otherwise.

    I think you have missed my point. The point is not that we have problems that need to be addressed. The point is that in a society where white supremacy is a societal norm, we address problems differently depending on the racial mix of the people affected by the problem.

    How this country has reacted to crime for decades, and how my friends reacted to increased crime in Buckhead, affords us the opportunity to see white supremacist attitudes at work in our country. Drugs, addiction, and related crime were prevalent in some Black communities in the 50s, and white America largely ignored the problem. Then, in the late 60s and 70s, drug use spread to whites. Drug enforcement became a big issue. The observable fact is that the country reacted differently to the problem depending on who was affected. (And, by the way, the reaction was to pass laws that disproportionately imprisoned Blacks.)

    White Americans need to begin to recognize what Blacks have seen for decades: when viewed from a white supremacist perspective, problems are important to whites only if they affect whites. That is exactly why the slogan (not the organization) “Black lives matter” is so meaningful to so many people. It is a Black plea to white people to recognize that their problems matter.

    So, by all means, let’s address crime in Buckhead. But this time, let’s address it everywhere.

    Have a happy Juneteenth!

  4. Allan, you’re correct that rising crime and violence is a problem in America, and I didn’t intend to imply otherwise.

    I think you have missed my point. The point is not that we have problems that need to be addressed. The point is that in a society where white supremacy is a societal norm, we address problems differently depending on the racial mix of the people affected by the problem.

    How this country has reacted to crime for decades, and how my friends reacted to increased crime in Buckhead, affords us the opportunity to see white supremacist attitudes at work in our country. Drugs, addiction, and related crime were prevalent in some Black communities in the 50s, and white America largely ignored the problem. Then, in the late 60s and 70s, drug use spread to whites. Drug enforcement became a big issue. The observable fact is that the country reacted differently to the problem depending on who was affected. (And, by the way, the reaction was to pass laws that disproportionately imprisoned Blacks.)

    White Americans need to begin to recognize what Blacks have seen for decades: when viewed from a white supremacist perspective, problems are important to whites only if they affect whites. That is exactly why the slogan (not the organization) “Black lives matter” is so meaningful to so many people. It is a Black plea to white people to recognize that their problems matter.

    So, by all means, let’s address crime in Buckhead. But this time, let’s address it everywhere.

    Have a happy Juneteenth!

  5. Louis Todisco

    The extent of violence and crime in areas where poor people and persons of color live is a national disgrace. Chicago, with its epidemic of guns and murder, mostly affecting poor people and persons of color, is perhaps an extreme example, but it is not the only place where these conditions exist. These conditions, i.e. high levels of crime and violence, do not exist to the same extent in areas where the population is predominantly affluent and white as they do where the population is predominantly poor and of persons of color. We can probably all agree on this much.
    The next step is more difficult. If we who are affluent and white can agree that crime and violence affect poor people and people of color to a greater extent than they affect affluent white people, do we then have to ask why this situation is allowed to exist ? Do we have to ask further then is it because those of us who are affluent and white do not care enough about the level of crime and violence against poor people and persons of color to see to it that this does not continue ? It is much harder to agree (admit) that you do not care enough to do something, than it it is to admit the condition exists.

    Maybe we as individuals and as a society have to come to grips, first, with whether we really care enough, to be a part of the solution to the inequities in our country that harm the lives of persons who are poor and who are of color. Maybe the conversation should be at this level, that is do we care, rather than at the level of debating abstract propositions such as “white privilege” or “white supremacy” which raise emotions and divert attention from practical solutions.

    What those solutions may be is a question for another day.

  6. The extent of violence and crime in areas where poor people and persons of color live is a national disgrace. Chicago, with its epidemic of guns and murder, mostly affecting poor people and persons of color, is perhaps an extreme example, but it is not the only place where these conditions exist. These conditions, i.e. high levels of crime and violence, do not exist to the same extent in areas where the population is predominantly affluent and white as they do where the population is predominantly poor and of persons of color. We can probably all agree on this much.
    The next step is more difficult. If we who are affluent and white can agree that crime and violence affect poor people and people of color to a greater extent than they affect affluent white people, do we then have to ask why this situation is allowed to exist ? Do we have to ask further then is it because those of us who are affluent and white do not care enough about the level of crime and violence against poor people and persons of color to see to it that this does not continue ? It is much harder to agree (admit) that you do not care enough to do something, than it it is to admit the condition exists.

    Maybe we as individuals and as a society have to come to grips, first, with whether we really care enough, to be a part of the solution to the inequities in our country that harm the lives of persons who are poor and who are of color. Maybe the conversation should be at this level, that is do we care, rather than at the level of debating abstract propositions such as “white privilege” or “white supremacy” which raise emotions and divert attention from practical solutions.

    What those solutions may be is a question for another day.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top